UNCLASSIFIED// RTTUZYUW RHSSXYZ0001 0471303-UUUU--RHSSSUU ZNR UUUUU R 161701Z FEB 11 FM CNO WASHINGTON DC TO AL NAVADMIN NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC BT UNCLAS PASS TO ALL OFFICE CODES: FM CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// TO NAVADMIN INFO CNO WASHINGTON DC//N1// NAVADMIN 054/11 MSGID/GENADMIN/CNO WASHINGTON DC/N1/FEB// SUBJ/NOTICE OF CONVENING FY-12 PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL (OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT) AND ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE NAVY SELECTION BOARD// RMKS/1. THIS NAVADMIN ANNOUNCES THE NOTICE OF CONVENING DATE FOR SUBJECT SELECTION BOARD AS 25 MARCH 2011. THE FOLLOWING LIST INDICATES THE NAME, ACTIVE-DUTY LIST NUMBER, AND DATE OF RANK OF THE SENIOR AND JUNIOR OFFICERS ON THE ACTIVE DUTY LIST IN THE COMPETITIVE CATEGORY OF NAVY JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL'S CORPS, WHO ARE ELIGIBLE FOR CONSIDERATION AS OF THE DATE OF THIS NAVADMIN. SENIOR ELIGIBLE - GAASCH, C. J. 010102-50 1 DEC 2001 JUNIOR ELIGIBLE - LEECH, D. W. 011062-50 1 JAN 2008 2. ONLY ELIGIBLE OFFICERS MAY COMMUNICATE WITH A SELECTION BOARD. ALL CORRESPONDENCE MUST ARRIVE NOT LATER THAN THE CONVENING DATE OF THE BOARD AND SHALL BE ADDRESSED TO: NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND (NPC) CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTER PRESIDENT, FY-12 ACTIVE DUTY ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE NAVY SELECTION BOARD #109 5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON, TN 38055 THE WRITTEN COMMUNICATION MAY CALL TO THE ATTENTION OF THE BOARD INFORMATION THE OFFICER CONSIDERS RELEVANT. THE WRITTEN COMMUNICATION MAY INCLUDE, AS ENCLOSURES, CORRESPONDENCE FROM ANY INDIVIDUAL CONCERNING THE ELIGIBLE OFFICER. CORRESPONDENCE NOT ORIGINATED BY THE ELIGIBLE OFFICER, INCLUDING ENDORSEMENTS TO THE OFFICER'S LETTER AND LETTERS WRITTEN ON BEHALF OF THAT OFFICER, MUST CONTAIN A WRITTEN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY THE ELIGIBLE OFFICER THAT HE OR SHE DESIRES SUCH CORRESPONDENCE BE PRESENTED TO THE BOARD. CORRESPONDENCE WITHOUT SUCH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS CONSIDERED THIRD PARTY CORRESPONDENCE AND WILL BE RETURNED. CLASSIFIED CORRESPONDENCE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 3. ELIGIBLE OFFICERS NOT WANTING TO BE CONSIDERED BY THIS BOARD MAY SUBMIT A REQUEST INDICATING THE DESIRE THAT THEIR RECORD NOT BE CONSIDERED. OFFICERS SUBMITTING REQUESTS NOT TO BE CONSIDERED WILL NOT BE ELIGIBLE AND THEIR RECORDS WILL NOT BE PRESENTED TO THE BOARD FOR CONSIDERATION. 4. THE FOLLOWING OFFICERS ARE NOT ELIGIBLE AND THEIR RECORDS WILL NOT BE PRESENTED TO THE BOARD FOR CONSIDERATION: ANY OFFICER WHO HAS AN APPROVED SEPARATION/RETIREMENT DATE AS OF THE CONVENING DATE OF THE BOARD; OR WAS RECOMMENDED BY A PREVIOUS SELECTION BOARD FOR APPOINTMENT AS ASSISTANT JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL OF THE NAVY OR LEGAL COUNSEL TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF (PURSUANT TO SECTION 156 OF TITLE 10 U.S. CODE). 5. RELEASED BY VADM MARK FERGUSON, N1. BT #0001 NNNN