Welcome to Exercise Bold Alligator
Skip navigation links
HOME
ABOUT BA
LEADERSHIP
NEWS
PHOTOS
PLATFORMS
PRESS KIT
CONTACTS
Skip navigation links
BOLD ALLIGATOR
CONTACTS
Photos
Releases
Questions
Leadership
About
Press Kit
Platforms
waspclass
DAY 1
DAY2
PRE-EXERCISE
DAY3
DAY4
DAY6
DAY8
DAY9
releases_jan
DAY 5
DAY7
NewsArchive
U.S. Fleet Forces Band
VFA-106
Welcome Aboard
About Us
Our Leadership
Family Support
Links
Commander
october
About 


ABOUT BOLD ALLIGATOR


HISTORY & BACKGROUND
OVERVIEW
DATA SHEET
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
LOGOS AND GRAPHICS

 

HISTORY & BACKGROUND

Initial CMC Guidance
The BOLD ALLIGATOR Series got its genesis from the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC)and the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) initial guidance dating back to 2008. In July of 2008 the Commandant of the Marine Corps called for a “revitalization of our amphibious competency … initial aiming point for regaining our amphibious forcible entry capabilities is training to Expeditionary Strike Group-Marine Expeditionary Brigade Command Element (ESG-MEB CE) amphibious assault requirements.” A CMC message from 2008 further stated, “I am directing that we conduct a series of workshops…and the intent of this initial series is to achieve the staff proficiency required to robustly exercise simulation-supported and real-world ESG-MEB CE planning and execution.”

Initial CNO Guidance
The CNO followed suit with guidance in 2009 that, “Our operations and procurement plans address the capabilities of both our Navy and Marine Corps. Marine Corps roots are at sea. Navy ships underpin expeditionary operations, thus our procurement resources are intertwined. We must integrate warfighting capabilities with the Marine Corps to meet the objectives of the Maritime Strategy and Naval Operations Concept. Effective integration must include Navy and Marine Corps consensus on operational matters and resource allocation.”

Common USN/USMC Goals
The focus of the BOLD ALLIGATOR exercise is based on the common goal of the Navy and Marine Corps leadership to revitalize, refine, and strengthen core amphibious competencies, which are critical to maritime power projection and are a cost-effective option for a wide range of military operations.

Flexibility & Utility of Amphibious Forces
History has shown that the capabilities that allow the amphibious force to conduct a forced entry landing against an opposing military force are the same capabilities that make it the force of choice for crisis response and building coalition partnerships.

Crawl/Walk/Run Approach
Several planning and Academic events in 2009 and 2010 culminated in BOLD ALLIGATOR(BA) 11, a simulated ESG-MEB sized event conducted in December of 2010. Lessons learned from BA11 drove the scenario and milestones for BA13.

Annual Exercise Commitment
U.S. Fleet Forces Command (USFFC) and U.S. Marine Corps Forces Command (MARFORCOM) have agreed to conduct an exercise each year, alternating between synthetic and live in order to concentrate on the more complex issues, refresh the practical and mechanical aspects of planning & conducting amphibious operations as well as refine what we learn and develop from these invaluable experiences.

TOP

OVERVIEW
Revitalization of Amphibious Skillsets
Exercise BOLD ALLIGATOR represents the Navy and Marine Corps revitalization of the fundamentals of amphibious operations, strengthening our traditional role as “warfighters from the sea.”

Exercise Objectives
Exercise objectives are a continuation & progression of Exercise BOLD ALLIGATOR 11, which was a synthetic exercise conducted in December 2011. BOLD ALLIGATOR 12 was a live and synthetic scenario-driven simulation supported exercise designed to train Expeditionary Strike Group TWO (ESG-2) and 2nd Marine Expeditionary Brigade (2dMEB) staffs to plan, coordinate and execute a MEB-sized amphibious assault from a seabase in a medium land and maritime threat environment to improve naval amphibious core competency. Highlight: It was be the first ever blended “Live/Synthetic” exercise of this magnitude and scale; allowing a dual focus on both units and staffs.

BOLD ALLIGATOR 11 compared to BOLD ALLIGATOR 12
Whereas BOLD ALLIGATOR 11 was executed in a low threat environment; BOLD ALLIGATOR 12 included mine and anti-ship threat, requiring significant shaping operations (MCM, CSG, SOF). One concept that was more carefully defined was the use of the Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF) in contribution to the fight. ESG-2/2d MEB used a Big Deck Amphib to serve as a “Harrier Carrier.” This provided an excellent platform to support USN operations against the threat.

BOLD ALLIGATOR 12 Exercise Participants
Over 20,000 Marines, Sailors, Airmen and Soldiers with more than 25 ships participated in the exercise. Coalition countries are also major contributors to the exercise with eight partner countries providing a mix of personnel, ships, and equipment. The coalition involvement as well as Carrier Strike Group integration into the exercise increased the complexity and the realism of the event.
A blended Blue-Green CFMCC staff provided a broad span of control and allowed for a critical review of seabasing from a Naval perspective.

Naval Expeditionary Forces played an important role during the exercise with Riverine units, Intelligence Exploitation Teams, Maritime Civil Affairs units, EOD, Port Security units and Seabees.

BOLD ALLIGATOR 12 also integrated Military Sealift Command (MSC) ship capabilities, to simulate sustainment and reinforcement of the 2d MEB Assault Echelon (AE). The use of a T-AK ship (Marine Corps Container & RO/RO) with an amphibious bulk liquid transfer system (ABLTS) forced “under the horizon” actions that stressed DDG/CG capacity and helped refine support relationship considerations. Additionally, the use of T-AVB ship (Aviation Logistics Support) provided intermediate level maintenance capability to the 2d MEB Aviation Combat Element (ACE) and enhanced their operational flexibility.

BOLD ALLIGATOR 12 Summary
A key point was ADM John C. Harvey’s emphasis on large-scale amphibious operations as “fleet operations” that required the full spectrum of USN capabilities. A MEB sized amphibious operation differs from a MEU sized operation in more than just scale, it is a much more complex issue involving many entities. We (USN/USMC Team) took a close look at Command Relationships and the supported/supporting roles across a broad spectrum of critical capabilities.

TOP

DATA SHEET

USFFC & MARFORCOM Key Messages:
- BA represents the Navy & Marine Corps' revitalization of the full range of amphibious operations.
- BA will focus on today's fight with today's forces.
- BA will showcase the advantages of seabasing.

BA Mission: Plan & execute a MEB-sized amphibious assault from a seabase in a medium threat environment.

BA Intent: Execute a multi-national, joint, live & synthetic scenario-driven exercise using East Coast operating areas to showcase USN/USMC amphibious operations as the nation's most viable offshore option.

Key BA Training Objectives:
- Enhance the relationships/partnerships between the Atlantic Fleet & II MEF.
- Execute Command & Control (C2) of all forces ISO amphibious operations from the sea base & phase aspects of C2 ashore.
- Refine the supported/supporting relationships & doctrine for ESG-MEB operations.
- Operate in an environment & define Commander Landing Force (CLF) role in countering threat.
- Integrate a Carrier Strike Group (CSG) in support of ESG-MEB amphibious operations.
- Integrate technological, platform & unit experimentation to enhance future capability.
- Engage organizations across the Navy & Marine Corps to develop enterprise solutions facing large-scale amphibious operations.

TOP

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Q1: What is Bold Alligator?
A1: Exercise Bold Alligator 2014,

Q2: What kind of operations will be conducted?
A2: bbbb

Q3: How are amphibious operations important to US military capability?
A3: sea."

Q4: What are some examples of recent events that required amphibious operations?
A4: Amphibious forces provide the flexible forward presence that will continue to be needed in the complex world environment where 70 percent of the world's population lives in the littoral regions. U.S. Marine Corps AV-8B Harriers aboard USS Kearsarge (LHD 3) provided critical support during Operation Odyssey Dawn March 20, 2011, conducting strikes against Qadhafi's ground forces and air defenses in Libya. The Essex Amphibious Ready Group launched 218 aircraft and landing craft in support of reconnaissance and relief distribution missions following the earthquake and subsequent tsunami that struck northeastern Japan March 11, 2011, delivering more than 166,000 pounds of supplies ashore. Following the January 2010 earthquake in Haiti, 5,000 Marines and 3,000 Sailors boarded seven amphibious ships and sailed to the aid of our neighbor to provide badly needed relief. The Iwo Jima Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG) with the embarked 24th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) evacuated over 15,000 American citizens between July 15 and August 20, 2006, following Israel's assault on southern Lebanon. By air and sea, USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD 6) and the 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit delivered more than 50 tons of humanitarian assistance Jan. 12, 2005, to tsunami victims on the Indonesian island of Sumatra. Events such as these highlight the continuing need for the full range of amphibious operations provided by the Navy and Marine Corps team.

Q5: Who are the participants in BA14?
A5: crises.

TOP

LOGOS AND GRAPHICS

Official BA13 logo
Low Resolution 85kb
High Resolution 3mb


8"x10" (3mb)
24"x36" (25mb)

  
Note: These images are all extremely large.  For best results, right-click, and use the "Save Target As..." option to download the files directly to your desktop.  You can then easily open the images from your computer.